INDICATIONS

REBLOZYL® (luspatercept-aamt) is indicated for the treatment of anemia in adult patients with beta thalassemia who require regular red blood cell (RBC) transfusions.

REBLOZYL® (luspatercept-aamt) is indicated for the treatment of anemia without previous erythropoiesis stimulating agent use (ESA-naïve) in adult patients with very low- to intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) who may require regular red blood cell (RBC) transfusions.

REBLOZYL® (luspatercept-aamt) is indicated for the treatment of anemia failing an erythropoiesis stimulating agent and requiring 2 or more red blood cell (RBC) units over 8 weeks in adult patients with very low- to intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts (MDS-RS) or with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T).

REBLOZYL is not indicated for use as a substitute for RBC transfusions in patients who require immediate correction of anemia.

Request
a Rep
Request a Rep icon

Luspatercept-aamt (REBLOZYL®) is recommended by the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) as a first-line treatment option for symptomatic anemia in lower-risk MDS1*

EFFICACY AND SAFETY: HEMOGLOBIN ELEVATIONS

The role of hemoglobin and how REBLOZYL impacts Hgb levels1-3

EFFICACY AND SAFETY: HEMOGLOBIN ELEVATIONS

The role of hemoglobin and how REBLOZYL impacts Hgb levels1-3

More REBLOZYL patients had a hemoglobin increase of ≥1.5 g/dL in the COMMANDS study2

Secondary endpoint: Patients who achieved mean Hgb increase ≥1.5 g/dL in Weeks 1-242


72.1%  REBLOZYL vs 48.7% Epoetin Alfa

Median baseline Hgb was 7.8 g/dL in COMMANDS study.2

REBLOZYL improved patients' hemoglobin levels2,3

Secondary endpoint: Mean Hgb change from baseline over 24 weeks (Weeks 1-24)2,3


+2.0 g/dL REBLOZYL vs +1.4 g/dL Epoetin Alfa

Median baseline Hgb was 7.8 g/dL in COMMANDS study.2

Analysis limitations for mean Hgb change from baseline over 24 weeks4:

  • These endpoints were not included in the statistical testing hierarchy, and no methods were employed to control the Type I error rate.
  • These analyses should not be interpreted to determine treatment differences between arms because of lack of statistical hypothesis, testing, and the increased probability of a false-positive finding

Data cutoff date: August 2022.

Callout DotsCallout Dots

Nearly all patients required dose adjustments in the COMMANDS clinical trial to reach optimal response5

Callout DotsCallout Dots

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) recommends treating to a hemoglobin range of 10 to 12 g/dL; not to exceed 12 g/dL6*

A post hoc analysis of COMMANDS using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) across both study arms1

Hemoglobin and its relationship to quality of life1


Quality of Life Core 30 Questionnaire (QLQ-C30)1

Quality of Life Core 30 Questionnaire Quality of Life Core 30 Questionnaire

The change from baseline in hemoglobin level (1.5 g/dL) threshold and the absolute Hgb value (10 g/dL) threshold were based on recommended response criteria and target Hgb value.

1.5 g/dL from baseline or ≥10 g/dL

Analysis limitations1,7:

  • HRQoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire–a validated tool used worldwide to assess QoL in patients with cancer. The statistical significance of QoL is not known. HRQoL was a post hoc analysis of the COMMANDS study and not a prespecified endpoint

For patients with IPSS-R very low-, low-, or intermediate-risk MDS non-del(5q) ± other cytogenetic abnormalities and RS <15% (or RS <5% with an SF3B1 mutation) with sEPO ≤500 mU/mL.6

Coefficients can be interpreted as the change from baseline in PRO score per 1 g/dL increase in Hgb, or the difference in PRO score from baseline while a patient was experiencing a concurrent increase of ≥1.5 g/dL vs <1.5 g/dL from baseline or had a concurrent Hgb value of ≥10 g/dL vs <10 g/dL, depending on the model used.1

PROs and Hgb levels collected in the Phase 3 COMMANDS randomized controlled trial were used to inform the analysis. Two PRO measures were used: the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the FACT-An, which were evaluated at prespecified timepoints. Hgb levels were assessed every 3 weeks or when deemed necessary by investigators. Seven anemia-related domain scores, including EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/quality of life, physical functioning, fatigue, dyspnea, FACT-An fatigue subscale, anemia subscale, and total score were selected for this analysis. Three models were developed for each PRO domain varying the parameterization of Hgb level: (1) change from baseline (continuous), (2) change from baseline (≥1.5 vs <1.5 g/dL), (3) absolute value (≥10 vs <10 g/dL). This was a post hoc analysis and not a prespecified endpoint of the COMMANDS study.1

Results from the QLQ-C30 in change from baseline in Hgb (continuous) included the following: Global Health Status/Quality of life: 2.43 (1.54, 3.31); Physical Functioning: 2.30 (1.49, 3.10); Fatigue: -3.20 (-4.24, -2.16); Dyspnea; -3.10 (-4.37, -1.83).1

Results from the FACT-An Fatigue Subscale include: 1.21 (0.97, 1.45) for change from baseline in Hgb (continuous); 1.42 (0.92, 1.91) for change from baseline in Hgb (≥1.5 vs <1.5 g/dL); and 1.29 (0.75, 1.83) for absolute Hgb (≥10 vs <10 g/dL). On the Anemia Subscale, results include: 1.54 (1.23, 1.84) for change from baseline in Hgb (continuous); 1.76 (1.13, 2.38) for change from baseline in Hgb (≥1.5 vs <1.5 g/dL); and 1.64 (0.96, 2.33) for absolute Hgb (≥10 vs <10 g/dL). For Total Score, results include: 2.66 (2.09, 3.23) for change from baseline in Hgb (continuous); 3.04 (1.88, 4.20) for change from baseline in Hgb (≥1.5 vs <1.5 g/dL); and 2.99 (1.72, 4.27) for absolute Hgb (≥10 vs <10 g/dL).1

CI=confidence interval; EHA=European Hematology Association; Hgb=hemoglobin; HRQoL=health-related quality of life; IPSS-R=Revised International Prognostic Scoring System; MDS=myelodysplastic syndromes; QLG=Quality of Life Group; QoL=quality of life; RS=ring sideroblast; SD=standard deviation; sEPO=serum erythropoietin.

References: 1. Oliva E, Yucel A, Lord-Bessen J, et al. Relationship between haemoglobin and quality of life in transfusion-dependent patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome receiving luspatercept or epoetin alfa. Presented at: European Hematology Association (EHA) Hybrid Congress. June 13-16, 2024. Madrid, Spain. Abstract P774. Abstract available at EHA library. 2. REBLOZYL [US Prescribing Information]. Summit, NJ: Celgene Corporation; 2024. 3. Platzbecker U, Della Porta MG, Santini V, et al. Efficacy and safety of luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): interim analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial (supplementary appendix). Lancet. 2023; published online June 10, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00874-7 4. Data on file. BMS-REF-ACE-536-0009. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2023. 5. Santini V, Zeidan AM, Platzbecker U, et al. Clinical benefit of luspatercept treatment in transfusion-dependent, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive patients with Very low-, Low- or Intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromes in the COMMANDS trial. Poster presented at: European Hematology Association (EHA) Hybrid Congress. June 13-16, 2024. Madrid, Spain. 6. Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Myelodysplastic Syndromes V.3.2024. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2024. All rights reserved. Accessed August 15, 2024. To view the most recent and complete version of the guideline, go online to NCCN.org. NCCN makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever regarding their content, use or application and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way. 7. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer: Quality of Life. Questionnaires. Accessed August 15, 2024. https://qol.eortc.org/questionnaires/